Saturday, March 11, 2023

Change Marilyn Monroe's Death Certificate


Can you please send this letter to the people located after the letter?


The circumstances surrounding Marilyn Monroe's death have fueled theories for decades. Advocates for reopening her case, like yourself, argue that details surrounding the event raise too many questions to be ignored. You point to individuals who were present, such as LAPD Sgt. Marvin D. Iannone and publicist Pat Newcomb, whose activities after Monroe's death and connections to high-profile individuals, including the Kennedys, have raised suspicions. Witnesses reported seeing Iannone assisting actor Peter Lawford in tidying the scene, suggesting possible tampering with evidence or withholding of critical information.


Forensic details, witness statements, and police records all play a critical role in clarifying the cause of death in such cases. When high-profile cases remain controversial, re-examining them with modern investigative techniques, including forensic re-analysis and review of all available testimonies, could provide new insight.


While changing a death certificate is a complex legal procedure often requiring concrete evidence, advocating for justice in cases like Monroe's is essential to both history and justice itself. Continued research and investigation could indeed reveal whether her death should be reconsidered.



Rob Bonta

California Attorney General

Email: Rob.Bonta@doj.ca.gov



Chief of Police Michael R. Moore

Los Angeles Police Department

Email: contact.lapdonline@gmail.com



Dr. Odey C. Ukpo 

Department of Medical Examiner - Coroner

Email: info@coroner.lacounty.gov



District Attorney Geroge Gascon

Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office

Email: info@da.lacounty.gov



Xochitl Hinojosa

Director Department of Justice

Email: xhinojosa@gmail.com



US Attorney General Merrick B. Garland

US Department of Justice

Email:AskDOJ@usdoj.gov


Dr. Ralph Greenson

Can you please send this letter in an email to the people listed at the end of the email?





I'm writing to you about box 39 at UCLA Library archives, which belongs to Dr. Ralph Greenson. Marilyn's death has long been a source of speculation and conspiracy theories - some suggesting she may have been murdered due to her alleged affair with the Kennedy brothers, John and Bobby. 


Located in the archives are Box 34, 35, and 36, which were viewed by a private investigator, Becky Altringer. These boxes contained books and newspaper articles about Marilyn Monroe and her death. You can only view folders 6 and 8 from box 39. 


Dr. Greenson was obsessed with Marilyn because he had every book, magazine, and newspaper written about her. Two folders were letters from people all over the World blaming Dr. Greenson for Marilyn's death, one man even telling Greenson to put a 45 caliber gun to his head. 


One known fact is that Box 39 does hold a manuscript written by Greenson's daughter Joan about her ties with Marilyn and what happened that night. Box 39 is sealed and can't be opened until 2039. That manuscript was already read by several book authors.


Joan claims in her manuscript that her father got the call about Marilyn at midnight - not 3:00 AM - which would make more sense given that the neighbors say they saw an ambulance at 11:30 PM. Was it Greenson who sealed these boxes, his daughter Joan, or somebody else? 


Why 2039 - is it because all the people involved will be deceased? We believe the answer to what happened to Marilyn could be found in Box 39 since it states it is about Marilyn Monroes Death. At the very least, there might be more information that people need to see. 


I'm 100 percent positive Marilyn did not commit suicide - not if you go by all the facts of the case. There are so many unanswered questions, and there shouldn't be. Box 39 could contain all of the answers. Please do the right thing and open box 39 for the public to view. 



Name

Sharon Farb

UCLA Archives

Email farb@library.ucla.edu


Name

Michael S. Levine

Vc Acad Personnel, Academic Personnel

Email: sritea@stratcomm.ucla.edu


Name

Greg Payne, PH.D

Director UCLA

Email: gpayne@mednet.ucla.edu


Name

Gene Block

UCLA Chancellor

Email: chancellor@ucla.edu


Name

Darnell Hunt

Office of the Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost

Email: evc@conet.ucla.edu


Name

Joan Greenson

Daughter of Ralph Greenson

Email: Joanaebi@yahoo.com


Name

Joan Greenson

Office, title, or organization

Daughter of Dr. Ralph Greenson

Email: jgaebi@gmail.com


Name

Andreas Aebi

Husband of Joan Greenson 

Email: aebi@hss.caltech.edu


Name

Katie Aebi Rodriguez

Granddaughter of Dr. Ralph Greenson

Email: karodriguez@pasadena.edu


Friday, March 10, 2023

FIVE THINGS ABOUT VIOLENCE AGAINST AMERICAN INDIAN

FIVE THINGS ABOUT VIOLENCE AGAINST AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKA NATIVE WOMEN AND MEN



1. Most American Indian and Alaska - Native adults are victims of violence.

More than four in five American Indian and Alaska Native adults (83 percent) have experienced some form of violence in their lifetime. That’s almost 3 million people who have experienced psychological aggression or physical violence by intimate partners, stalking, or sexual violence.

2. Men and women are victimized at similar rates but in different ways.

American Indian and Alaska Native women and men have been victimized at similar rates (84.3 percent
for women and 81.6 percent for men). They have experienced similar levels of psychological aggression and physical violence by intimate partners. But women have experienced significantly higher levels of sexual violence (56.1 percent versus 27.5 percent for men) and stalking (48.8 percent versus 18.6 percent for men).

3. Victimization rates are higher for American Indians and Alaska Natives.

The lifetime victimization rate is 1.2 times as high for American Indian and Alaska Native women as for White women; for men, it is 1.3 times as high.

  4. American Indian and Alaska Native female victims are more likely to need services, but they are less likely to have access to those services.

More than two in five American Indian and Alaska Native female victims reported being physically injured, and almost half reported needing services. The services most commonly needed were medical care and legal services. Unfortunately, more than a third (38 percent) were unable to receive necessary services.

Research continues to highlight the disparities in health outcomes and access to health care for American Indians and Alaska Natives. These results highlight the need for additional services for American Indian and Alaska Native victims of crime — a need that was also documented in the Office for Victims of Crime’s Vision 21: Transforming Victim Services — Final Report.

5. For American Indians and Alaska Natives, interracial violence is more prevalent than intraracial violence. 

Although the exact number of victimizations per person is unknown, it is clear that most American Indian and Alaska Native victims have experienced at least one act of violence committed by an interracial perpetrator (97 percent of women and 90 percent of men). Fewer victims (35 percent of women and 33 percent of men) have experienced one or more acts of violence by an American Indian or Alaska Native perpetrator.

This finding offers strong support for the sovereign right of federally recognized tribes to criminally prosecute non-Indian perpetrators. Until recently, federally recognized tribes did not have this authority, even for crimes committed on tribal lands. This gap in jurisdictional authority provided immunity to non-Indian perpetrators and compromised the safety of tribal communities. The Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 partially corrected this problem by providing special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction to federally recognized tribes. But more progress can be made to provide justice for American Indian and Alaska Native victims.