Monday, October 14, 2024
DO YOU REALLY KNOW ABOUT CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS?
Thursday, October 10, 2024
UPDATE: Alabama Police Seek Help Finding Missing Ohio Hiker
East Alabama police are asking hikers along the Pinhoti Trail to be on the lookout for an Ohio woman who never returned from a hiking trip more than three weeks ago.
The Cleburne County Sheriff’s Department said that Vendula “Wendy” Rose left her home in Marysville, Ohio, on September 20 and drove to the Dugger Mountain area in Alabama, where she hiked a portion of the long-distance Pinhoti Trail. A missing persons report was filed in Ohio on October 4 after Rose failed to return to work, and her car was found near the Pinhoti Trailhead in Cheaha State Park the next day.
Investigators used the car’s GPS, traffic cameras, and tag readers to track her movements after coming to Alabama. On September 23, the car traveled to South Carolina, arriving in the early hours on the 24th. She returned to Clerburne County that night. She was seen on surveillance video making a purchase in Oxford and leaving the business alone.
From Oxford, she drove to the Pinhoti Trailhead, where her car was later found. After finding the car, multiple agencies searched nearly 40 miles of trails in the area without finding a trace of the missing woman.
Investigators say that Rose told her family and friends she was heading to Alabama and had mentioned the Pinhoti Trail. She said she was leaving some personal items in a safe deposit box and left her work keys with her employer.
Cleburne County investigators said they don’t believe any foul play is involved but do believe Rose is suffering a mental health crisis.
Crime Online
October 10, 2024
Wednesday, September 4, 2024
Prosecutor asks for a charge to be reinstated against Alec Baldwin in Rust case.
They are doing this to attract attention. No one will want to film in New Mexico if this is what they do to actors.
SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — A prosecutor asked a New Mexico judge to reconsider the decision to dismiss an involuntary manslaughter charge against Alec Baldwin in the fatal shooting of a cinematographer on the set of a Western movie, according to a court filing made public Wednesday.
Special prosecutor Kari Morrissey said insufficient facts supported the July ruling and Baldwin's due process rights had not been violated.
State District Court Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer dismissed the case halfway through a trial based on the withholding of evidence by police and prosecutors from the defense in the 2021 shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the film "Rust."
The charge against Baldwin was dismissed with prejudice, meaning it can't be revived once any appeals of the decision are exhausted.
Baldwin, the lead actor and co-producer on "Rust," was pointing a gun at cinematographer Halyna Hutchins during a rehearsal when it went off, killing her and wounding director Joel Souza. Baldwin has said he pulled back the hammer — but not the trigger — and the revolver fired.
The case-ending evidence was ammunition that was brought into the sheriff's office in March by a man who said it could be related to Hutchins' killing. Prosecutors said they deemed the ammunition unrelated and unimportant, while Baldwin's lawyers alleged that they "buried" it and filed a successful motion to dismiss the case.
In her decision to dismiss the Baldwin case, Marlowe Sommer described "egregious discovery violations constituting misconduct" by law enforcement and prosecutors, as well as false testimony about physical evidence by a witness during the trial.
In the request to reconsider, Morrissey argued again that the undisclosed ammunition was not relevant to the case against Baldwin, which hinged on his responsibility to handle a gun safely under familiar industry guidelines.
"No one on the prosecution team ... ever intentionally kept evidence from the defendant, it simply didn't occur to the prosecution that the rounds were relevant to the case even if they were the same or similar to the live rounds found on the set of 'Rust,'," Morrissey wrote.
She asserted that defense attorneys knew about the rounds but canceled an opportunity to view them prior to trial.
"This is a smoke screen created by the defense and was intended to sway and confuse the court ... and it was successful," Morrissey wrote.
Baldwin's lead attorney, Luke Nikas, didn't immediately respond to requests for comment about Morrissey's filing.
Movie armorer Hannah Gutierrez-Reed is serving an 18-month sentence on a conviction for involuntary manslaughter. She was accused of flouting standard safety protocols and missing multiple opportunities to detect forbidden live ammunition on set. Assistant director and safety coordinator David Halls pleaded no contest to the negligent use of a deadly weapon and was sentenced to six months of unsupervised probation. A no contest plea isn't an admission of guilt but is treated as such for sentencing purposes.
It hasn't been officially determined who brought the live rounds that killed Hutchins to the set, though prosecutors allege that Gutierrez-Reed was responsible.
The ammunition that skuttled the case was handed over to a Santa Fe County Sheriff's Office crime scene technician who filed the evidence under an unrelated case number. Three of those rounds resembled live rounds that were collected from the "Rust" set after the fatal shooting.
The mysterious ammunition was dropped off at the sheriff's office by Troy Teske, of Bullhead City, Arizona, who routinely stored weapons and ammunition for his friend and longtime movie-gun coach Thell Reed — Gutierrez-Reed's step-father and mentor as a film-set armorer.
Morrissey asked the judge to order defense attorneys to show when and how they learned of the ammunition provided by Teske, calling the defense motion to dismiss the case "all a ruse."
Attorneys for Baldwin have said he was unaware that live ammunition had been brought to the film set and that prosecutors hid evidence while trying to establish a link between the live ammo on set and Gutierrez-Reed. They said prosecutors wanted to drive home the argument that Baldwin should have recognized the armorer's blundering youth and inexperience.
Gutierrez-Reed is seeking the dismissal of her involuntary manslaughter conviction based on the allegations of suppressed evidence that emerged at Baldwin's trial.
Separately, Gutierrez-Reed has requested a plea hearing on a felony firearms charge pertaining to accusations that she took a gun into a Santa Fe bar weeks before "Rust" began filming.
Defense attorney Jason Bowles did not respond to a message seeking more information.
Monday, September 2, 2024
Drone Surveillance: Ethical and Legal Considerations for Private Investigators
Staying modern and innovate is crucial for detectives. One innovative method for Private Investigators includes utilizing drone technology, a tool that has revolutionized surveillance methods.
Imagine an investigator looking to collect evidence in a hard to access area—drones not only make this feasible but also effective and discreet. This advancement in technology presents possibilities, along with a range of challenges and responsibilities that cannot be overlooked.
The appeal of drones in investigations lies in their capacity to offer viewpoints, capture detailed images, and provide a level of surveillance previously unattainable.
Like any surveillance tool, the ethical and legal consequences must be thoroughly examined. The rapid integration of drones has surpassed the development of regulations leaving investigators grappling with a complex maze of laws and ethical dilemmas.
The Rise of Drone Surveillance in Private Investigations
Historical Context and Technological Advancements
The field of surveillance technology has undergone changes over the years. From surveillance methods like stakeouts and covert photography to the incorporation of cutting-edge tools, private investigators have consistently adjusted their techniques to keep pace with technological advancements.
The emergence of drones represents a milestone in this evolution bringing capabilities that were previously beyond reach. Drones, equipped with imaging technology and high-resolution cameras offer aerial perspectives that allow investigators to gather detailed evidence, from angles that were once inaccessible.
Benefits of Using Drones in Investigations
There are several benefits of using drones in private investigations:
- Enhanced Surveillance Capabilities:
- Drones offer comprehensive coverage of large areas quickly and discreetly, especially useful in scenarios with limited or hazardous ground access.
- For example, as highlighted by Insight Investigations, drones are effective in proving anti-social behavior and monitoring criminal activities on private land.
- Cost-Effectiveness:
- Drones provide a more economical alternative to traditional aerial surveillance methods such as chartering helicopters or planes.
- The ability to deploy drones on-demand reduces logistical complexities and expenses associated with manned aerial operations.
- Increased Safety for Investigators:
- Utilizing drones minimizes the need for direct, potentially risky engagements with subjects, thereby enhancing the safety of investigators.
- This technological advancement allows for remote surveillance, keeping investigators out of potentially dangerous situations.
The integration of drones into private investigations elevates the efficiency and scope of surveillance while ensuring operations are conducted with greater precision and reduced risk.
Legal Considerations for Drone Surveillance
Federal Regulations
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has established comprehensive rules governing the commercial use of drones to ensure safety and compliance in U.S. airspace. Key requirements include:
- Drone Registration: All drones used for commercial purposes must be registered with the FAA.
- Pilot Certification: Operators must obtain a Remote Pilot Certificate by passing an aeronautical knowledge test.
- Operational Limits: Drones must be flown within visual line-of-sight, during daylight hours, and at or below 400 feet. Additionally, there are restrictions on flying over people and near airports.
These regulations are crucial for maintaining safety and legal compliance in drone operations. For more detailed information, you can refer to the FAA’s guidelines on their official website.
State-Specific Laws
While federal regulations provide a baseline, state laws can vary significantly, often imposing stricter guidelines. For example, Texas has stringent regulations that prohibit drone surveillance without the subject’s consent, reflecting the state’s strong emphasis on privacy rights. In Florida, drone use for surveillance purposes is tightly regulated to prevent invasion of privacy and ensure ethical practices, as highlighted by Pro Process Servers.
Privacy Laws and Legal Precedents
Privacy laws are a critical aspect of drone surveillance, aimed at protecting individuals from unwarranted intrusion. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, extends to aerial surveillance.
Notable legal cases, such as California v. Ciraolo, have set important precedents. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that aerial surveillance without a warrant did not violate the Fourth Amendment because the airspace is considered public domain.
Private investigators must be acutely aware of these legal frameworks to avoid potential lawsuits and ensure their operations are within legal boundaries.
Ethical Considerations for Drone Surveillance
Balancing Surveillance Needs with Privacy Rights
Respecting individuals’ privacy is paramount in private investigations, especially with the intrusive potential of drone surveillance. The ethical dilemma lies in balancing the necessity of gathering crucial evidence with the obligation to respect privacy rights.
Private investigators must navigate this fine line to ensure their actions do not infringe on personal privacy, which can lead to legal and reputational repercussions.
Guidelines for Ethical Drone Use
To maintain ethical standards, investigators should adhere to industry best practices. This includes operating drones in a manner that minimizes intrusion and avoids collecting unnecessary information about non-subjects.
Transparency with clients and subjects is also crucial. According to Insight Investigations, it’s important to inform clients about the ethical boundaries and legal constraints of drone use.
Impact on Public Perception
Public concerns about privacy and the ethical use of drones are significant. Misuse or perceived misuse of drones can lead to a loss of public trust and potential backlash. To build trust and credibility, investigators should engage in transparent practices and educate the public about the ethical use of drones. This includes being upfront about the purposes of drone surveillance and the measures taken to protect privacy.
Practical Applications of Drone Surveillance
Common Use Cases in Private Investigations
Drones have become invaluable tools in various aspects of private investigations due to their versatility and advanced capabilities. Some common use cases include:
- Land Surveys and Property Disputes:
- Drones can capture high-resolution aerial images, providing detailed views of large properties. This is particularly useful in boundary disputes or assessing land usage.
- According to JOUAV, drones can efficiently gather data for creating accurate maps and 3D models, which are essential in resolving property disputes.
- Surveillance for Infidelity and Custody Cases:
- Drones offer discreet observation, enabling investigators to monitor subjects without being detected. This is crucial in cases of suspected infidelity or child custody disputes where evidence gathering must be covert.
- Drones off the ability to gather visual evidence from a distance without intruding on personal space makes drones ideal for such sensitive cases.
- Insurance Fraud Investigations:
- Drones can quickly assess large areas for signs of fraud, such as staged accidents or property damage claims. Their ability to cover difficult terrains makes them effective in these investigations.
Success Stories and Case Studies
The effectiveness of drones in private investigations is evidenced by numerous success stories and case studies:
- Example of Successful Drone Surveillance Operation:
- A notable case involved a private investigator using drones to gather evidence in a large-scale insurance fraud investigation. The drones provided aerial footage that contradicted the claimant’s reports, leading to a successful case resolution.
- This case, detailed by AV8 Prep, showcases how drones can uncover discrepancies that would be challenging to identify through ground-based investigations.
- Lessons Learned from Real-Life Applications:
- One key lesson is the importance of adhering to legal and ethical guidelines to ensure the admissibility of evidence. Successful operations often involve meticulous planning and compliance with regulatory frameworks.
- IntechOpen emphasizes the need for continuous training and staying updated with technological advancements to maximize the potential of drone surveillance.
By leveraging the capabilities of drones in various investigative scenarios, private investigators can enhance their efficiency and effectiveness. The practical applications and real-life success stories underscore the transformative impact of drones in modern surveillance.
Best Practices for Private Investigators Using Drones
Staying Informed and Compliant
To effectively utilize drones in private investigations, staying informed about legal updates and technological advancements is crucial. Continuous education ensures that investigators remain compliant with ever-evolving regulations and leverage the latest drone technologies.
Engaging in regular training sessions and workshops can help keep skills sharp and knowledge current. Collaboration with legal experts and industry peers is also beneficial. By working closely with legal professionals, investigators can navigate complex regulatory landscapes and ensure their practices are legally sound.
Additionally, joining industry groups or forums can provide valuable insights and updates on best practices.
Implementing Robust Operational Protocols
Developing and adhering to standard operating procedures (SOPs) for drone use is essential for maintaining consistency and legal compliance in surveillance operations. These SOPs should outline specific protocols for different scenarios, ensuring that every aspect of drone operation is meticulously planned and executed.
Incorporating risk management and contingency planning into these protocols is vital. This includes identifying potential risks, such as equipment failure or legal challenges, and establishing clear procedures to mitigate these risks. Regular reviews and updates of SOPs can help adapt to new regulations and technological advancements.
Enhancing Skills and Expertise
Investing in training programs for drone piloting and data analysis is crucial for maximizing the effectiveness of drone surveillance. Comprehensive training ensures that investigators are proficient in operating drones and interpreting the data collected.
Leveraging advanced tools and software can further enhance the quality of surveillance. Tools for data analysis, such as geospatial mapping and AI-driven image recognition, can provide deeper insights and more accurate results.
By continuously honing their skills and embracing new technologies, private investigators can maintain a competitive edge and ensure their surveillance practices are both effective and compliant with legal standards.
Takeaways
The ethical and legal considerations for drone surveillance in private investigations are paramount. Ensuring compliance with FAA regulations, adhering to state-specific laws, and respecting privacy rights are critical. Implementing best practices such as continuous education, robust operational protocols, and enhanced training programs are essential for responsible drone use. By following these guidelines, private investigators can effectively leverage drone technology while maintaining legal and ethical standards.
Posted on August 7, 2024
Private Investigator Industry News
El Dorado Insurance
Saturday, April 6, 2024
The Black Dahlia.
On January 15, 1947, Elizabeth Short’s dead body was found in the Los Angeles neighborhood of Leimert Park. The first person who reported the grisly sight was a mother out for a morning walk with her child.
According to the woman, the way Short’s body had been posed made her think that the corpse was a mannequin at first. But a closer look revealed the true horror of the Black Dahlia crime scene.
The 22-year-old Short had been sliced in two at the waist and completely drained of blood. Some of her organs — such as her intestines — had been removed and neatly placed underneath her buttocks. Pieces of flesh had been cut away from her thighs and breasts. And her stomach was full of feces, leading some to believe that she’d been forced to eat them before she was killed.
Elizabeth Short, aka the "Black Dahlia," was just 22 years old when she was brutally murdered in Los Angeles on January 15, 1947. It remains one of Hollywood's most disturbing cold cases to this day.
The most chilling mutilations, however, were the lacerations on her face. The killer had sliced each side of her face from the corners of her mouth to her ears, creating what’s known as a “Glasgow smile.”
Since the body had already been washed clean, Los Angeles Police Department detectives concluded that she must have been killed elsewhere before being dumped in Leimert Park.
Near her body, detectives noted a heel print and a cement sack with traces of blood that had presumably been used to transport her body to the vacant lot. The LAPD reached out to the FBI to help identify the body by searching their fingerprint database. Short’s fingerprints turned up rather quickly because she had applied for a job as a clerk at the U.S. Army’s Camp Cooke commissary in California in 1943.
And then her prints turned up a second time since she had been arrested by the Santa Barbara Police Department for underage drinking — just seven months after she’d applied to the job.
The FBI also had her mugshot from her arrest, which they provided to the press. Before long, the media began reporting every salacious detail they could find about Short.
Meanwhile, Elizabeth Short’s mother, Phoebe Short, didn’t learn of her daughter’s death until reporters from The Los Angeles Examiner telephoned her, pretending that Elizabeth had won a beauty contest.
They pumped her for all the details they could get on Elizabeth before revealing the terrible truth. Her daughter had been murdered, and her corpse had been dismembered in unspeakable ways.
As the media learned more about Elizabeth Short’s history, they began to brand her as a sexual deviant. One police report read, “This victim knew at least fifty men at the time of her death and at least twenty-five men had been seen with her in the sixty days preceding her death… She was known as a teaser of men.”
They gave Short the nickname, “The Black Dahlia,” due to her reported preference for wearing a lot of sheer black clothing. This was a reference to the movie The Blue Dahlia, which was out at the time. Some people spread the false rumor that Short was a prostitute, while others baselessly claimed that she liked to tease men because she was a lesbian.
Adding to her mystique, Short was reportedly a Hollywood hopeful. She had moved to Los Angeles just six months before her death and worked as a waitress. Sadly, she had no known acting jobs and her death became her one claim to fame.
But as famous as the case was, authorities had tremendous difficulty figuring out who was behind it. However, members of the media did receive a few clues. On January 21st, about a week after the body was found, the Examiner received a call from a person claiming to be the murderer, who said he would be sending Short’s belongings in the mail as proof of his claim.
Shortly thereafter on the 24th, the Examiner received a package with Short’s birth certificate, photos, business cards, and an address book with the name Mark Hansen on the cover. Also included was a letter pasted together from newspaper and magazine letter clippings that read, “Los Angeles Examiner and other Los Angeles papers here is Dahlia’s belongings letter to follow.”
All of these items had been wiped down with gasoline, leaving no fingerprints behind. Though a partial fingerprint was found on the envelope, it was damaged in transport and never analyzed.
On January 26th, another letter arrived. This handwritten note read, “Here it is. Turning in Wed. January 29, 10 a.m. Had my fun at police. Black Dahlia Avenger.” The letter included a location. Police waited at the appointed time and place, but the author never showed.
Afterward, the alleged killer sent a note made of letters cut and pasted from magazines to the Examiner that said, “Have changed my mind. You would not give me a square deal. Dahlia killing was justified.”
Yet again, everything sent by the person had been wiped clean with gasoline, so investigators couldn’t lift any fingerprints from the evidence.
At one point, the LAPD had 750 investigators on the case and interviewed more than 150 potential suspects linked to the Black Dahlia killing. Officers heard more than 60 confessions during the initial investigation, but none of them were considered legitimate. Since then, there have been more than 500 confessions, none of which led to anyone being charged.
As time went on and the case went cold, many people assumed that the Black Dahlia murder was a date gone wrong, or that Short had run into a sinister stranger late at night while walking alone. After over 70 years, the Black Dahlia murder case remains open. But in recent years, a couple of intriguing — and chilling — theories have emerged.
A police bulletin seeking information on Elizabeth Short’s activities prior to the murder describes her as “very attractive” with “bad lower teeth” and “fingernails chewed to quick.”
Shortly after his father’s death in 1999, now-retired LAPD detective Steve Hodel was going through his dad’s belongings when he noticed two photos of a woman who bore a striking resemblance to Elizabeth Short.
After discovering these haunting images, Hodel began using the skills he had gained as a policeman to investigate his own deceased father. Hodel went through newspaper archives and witness interviews from the case, and even filed a Freedom of Information Act to obtain FBI files on the Black Dahlia murder.
He also had a handwriting expert compare samples of his father’s writing to the writing on some of the notes sent to the press from the alleged killer. The analysis found a strong possibility that his father’s handwriting matched, but the results were not conclusive.
On the grislier side, the Black Dahlia crime scene photos showed that Short’s body had been cut in a manner consistent with a hemicorporectomy, a medical procedure that slices the body beneath the lumbar spine. Hodel’s father had been a doctor — who attended medical school when this procedure was being taught in the 1930s.
Additionally, Hodel searched his father’s archives at UCLA, finding a folder full of receipts for contracting work on his childhood home. In that folder, there was a receipt dated a few days before the murder for a large bag of concrete, the same size, and brand as a concrete bag found near Elizabeth Short’s body.
By the time Hodel began his investigation, many of the police officers who originally worked on the case were already dead. However, he carefully reconstructed conversations these officers had about the case.
Eventually, Hodel compiled all of his evidence into a 2003 bestseller called Black Dahlia Avenger: The True Story.
7 Myths About the “Wild West”
Few periods in American history have been more romanticized than the era of the “Wild West.” The period began with the first European colonial settlements in North America during the early 17th century, but what can be regarded as the classic era of the Old West — with its cowboys, gunslingers, prospectors and outlaws — stretched from around the 1850s to the early 1900s. Dime novels and Western movies created a frontier myth in which rugged men rode out to conquer a barren landscape and fight “bad guys,” and the image became a popular and enduring part of American culture, despite the many historical inaccuracies involved.
As a testament to the power of this mythmaking, many ideas and iconic images associated with the Old West are still widely accepted today, despite being factually incorrect. Here are seven of the most common misconceptions, debunked.
Myth: Wild West Cowboys Wore Cowboy Hats
Nothing says “cowboy” more than a classic cowboy hat. But the Stetson didn’t come onto the market until 1865, and the original hat didn’t look like the iconic Stetsons we know today (it had a high top and was missing the crease in the crown typical of cowboy hats). A more common choice among Old West cowboys was the derby hat, also known as the bowler hat, partly because it didn’t blow off easily in strong winds or while riding a horse. Many famous cowboys and outlaws, including Butch Cassidy, the Sundance Kid, Black Bart, and Billy the Kid, wore bowler hats.
Myth: Quick-Draw Gun Duels Were Common
Quick-draw gun duels are a staple of Western dime novels and movies, typically with two steely-eyed gunfighters facing off in a dusty street while nervous locals watch from behind saloon doors and dirty windows. These kinds of duels, however, almost never happened. Typical shootouts were normally chaotic and impulsive events, often involving more than two men and with bullets flying in all directions — not the slow and calculated high-noon face-offs depicted in popular culture. One of the very few examples of a one-on-one quick-draw duel in a public place is the famous encounter between “Wild Bill” Hickok and the gambler Davis Tutt. Hickok killed Tutt, becoming a folk hero in the process.
Myth: Banks Were Easy Pickings
If Westerns are to be believed, robbing banks was a common pastime for any self-respecting outlaw. The criminals would ride into town in broad daylight, hold up a bank, ride off with their saddlebags full of money, and disappear into the wilderness. But this is very much a Hollywood creation. According to historian Larry Schweikart, there were fewer than 10 confirmed bank robberies between 1859 and 1900 across 15 frontier states. Other sources suggest the number was higher than 10, but still fewer than you would suspect. As Schweikart wrote, “There are more bank robberies in modern-day Dayton, Ohio, in a year than there were in the entire Old West in a decade, perhaps in the entire frontier period!” Myth: Cowboys Frequently Fought With “Indians”
Myth: Cowboys Frequently Fought With “Indians”
The popular “cowboys and Indians” narrative has both parties constantly at each other’s throats. (The use of the word “Indian” originated with Christopher Columbus, who mistakenly believed he had reached the shores of South Asia when he arrived in America, and referred to the native population as “Indios.”) But cowboys rarely fought with Indigenous peoples, and certainly not to the extent shown in Western movies. Tension did exist between ranchers and Native Americans, but cowboys normally avoided potentially hostile encounters (they were more inclined to let soldiers deal with that). Native Americans, meanwhile, didn’t ambush pioneer wagon trains nearly as much as we are led to believe — they mainly tolerated wagon trains and were more likely to trade than attack. Between 1840 and 1860, Native Americans killed 362 emigrants (and even more were killed by emigrants), making them far less dangerous than many other threats in the Wild West, including river crossings, hunting accidents, and falling off your own horse.
Myth: All Cowboys Were White
John Wayne, Gary Cooper, James Stewart, Clint Eastwood — think of nearly any actor known for starring in classic Westerns and they have one thing in common: They’re all white. The popular narrative, however, doesn’t tell the full story. Historians estimate that as many as one in four American cowboys were Black, as many formerly enslaved African Americans found work on the ranches out West in the wake of the Civil War. What’s more, the cowboy culture didn’t even originate in the United States; it came from a style of ranching introduced by Spanish colonists in the 16th century and adopted originally in Mexico, where cattle ranchers and herders were known as “vaqueros.” By the late 19th century, as many as one in three cowboys were Mexican.
Myth: The Typical Frontiersman Was a Romantic Figure
Cowboys and Wild West lawmen are often portrayed as romantic types — either the strong, silent type or the gallant hero who rides to the rescue, looking quite dapper in his clean shirt and shiny boots. But these frontiersmen were nowhere near as neat and tidy as we see on our screens, and, to put it bluntly, they stank. Author and historian Harry E. Chrisman wrote that cowboys “smelled of cow and horse dung, and seldom bathed. They wore beards that easily became nests for lice, fleas, or other vermin and provided secure foci of infection for barber’s itch.”
Myth: Everyone Was Packing a Six-Shooter
In the movies, it seems like every cowboy, cowhand, and dubious wandering stranger carries a revolver or a rifle. In reality, guns were heavily regulated in many towns and cities on the frontier. Most people did own guns in the West, but when it came to entering a town, you either had to leave your weapon at home or hand it over to local authorities. Dodge City, a famously wild frontier town in Kansas, had a large sign in the middle of town reading: “The Carrying of Firearms Strictly Prohibited.” Indeed, the gunfight at the O.K. Corral in Tombstone, Arizona — the most famous shootout in the history of the Old West — reached a head when lawman Wyatt Earp ordered a group of cowboys to drop their weapons in accordance with local laws. According to Adam Winkler, a specialist in U.S. constitutional law, “Tombstone had much more restrictive laws on carrying guns in public in the 1880s than it has today.
Kim Kardashian is an idiot!
Kim Kardashian claims people ‘didn’t know’ who Marilyn Monroe was before she wore her dress.
The dress was first worn first in 1962.
Kim Kardashian has claimed that a lot of people only found out about Marilyn Monroe after she wore her dress to the Met Gala back in 2022.
Kardashian reportedly lost 16lbs to fit into Monroe’s famous “Happy Birthday Mr President” dress, which later sparked a debate about whether she had damaged it. The reality TV star denies this.
While appearing on NBC’s Today Show, the 43-year-old said she was shocked at how many people knew nothing about the actress.
“We were just talking. You said you were shocked on TikTok. Some people don’t even know who Marilyn Monroe was,” said host Savannah Guthrie.
In response, the mother of four said: “That was the most shocking thing to me, and that’s why I was so happy to at least have that opportunity and that Ripley’s allowed me to share this moment so that it could live on.”
The famous dress was worn by Monroe in Madison Square Garden in 1962, just three months before her death. While President John F. Kennedy branded her rendition of Happy Birthday as “wholesome,” a large number of people thought it was inappropriate and innately sexual.
Kardashian has been slammed for choosing to wear the one-of-a-kind dress, with many suggesting she was only doing it for the clout. But as she told Guthrie, she understands “how much this dress means to American history.”
People have known about Marilyn Monore since she became famous and still know of her today before Kardashian wore that dress. I was disgusted that she was allowed to wear it, and I don't like any of the Kardashians. They only became famous because their father helped someone get away with murder!
Thursday, January 11, 2024
Thursday, October 26, 2023
‘Bury them in fruit jars.’ A gay mass murder and the cover-up that followed.
Fifty years after the deadly fire at New Orleans' Up Stairs Lounge, new perspectives consider the atrocities that occurred after the blaze.
Flames shot through the crowded Up Stairs Lounge as bartender Buddy Rasmussen opened the front door to see who had been ringing the downstairs buzzer. Someone had lit the popular bar’s stairwell carpet on fire, and it burned its way up the wooden stairs into the bar, quickly igniting the lounge’s red wallpaper, curtains, and posters of Burt Reynolds naked on a bearskin rug and Olympic swimmer Mark Spitz wearing his seven gold medals, a star-spangled Speedo, and a smile.
Some patrons saw the blaze and ran for the nearest exits or down the stairwell, emerging with their clothes on fire as neighbors raced to pour pitchers of water onto them. Rasmussen began tapping patrons on the shoulder to follow him toward the fire exit at the back of the bar, but many were too shocked by the exploding blaze to move.
The June 24, 1973, conflagration, likely set by a sex worker ejected from the New Orleans bar earlier that night, killed 32 people and injured at least 15 others.
Yet the reaction to the catastrophe hardly matched the immense suffering the fire caused, and the tragedy was compounded by multiple denials: Public officials refused to issue statements about the fire, and Catholic churches refused to hold funeral services for the victims, whom they saw as unrepentant sinners. The media only reported on the fire briefly or not at all, and some families refused to claim their relatives’ bodies because they didn’t want to acknowledge that they were gay. Three of the victims ended up buried in unmarked graves — two remain unidentified.
To this day, the arson remains unsolved.
Hate crimes reverberate through communities, intimidating an entire class of people. The Up Stairs Lounge had been a safe space in the gay-friendly, tourist-heavy French Quarter. But as bar patrons feared a similar attack on other gathering spots, still others worried that police might start raiding gay bars more often and arresting more men in the name of public safety. Bar owners believed talking too much about the fire could hurt business. And locals just wanted to move on from the horror.
As a result, to this day, even many queer New Orleanians aren’t aware of the most devastating fire in their city’s history, the deadliest massacre of gay men in the U.S. before the June 2016 Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando, Florida.
This year, half a century later, there’s considerable important work being done to ensure that the arson and its aftermath are remembered and the deaths memorialized. For the tragedy’s anniversary, a group of community activists, religious leaders, and queer historians partnered with the LGBT+ Archives Project of Louisiana and the Historic New Orleans Collection to organize a weekend of commemorative events at the end of June.
The weekend, attended by LGBTQ Nation, featured discussions with religious leaders and activists who lent a hand in the fire’s aftermath, artists who have made documentaries and theatrical works based on the event, church leaders concerned with the tragedy’s spiritual legacy, and podcasters and archivists dedicated to preserving its terrible memory. The weekend events also included art exhibitions, film screenings, a memorial service, and a “second line” jazz funeral through the city’s streets to the now defunct bar’s front entrance.
Their work is especially important considering the current backlash against remembering the atrocities America has committed against its most vulnerable communities. Extreme right-wingers are busy denying our guilt over slavery, the genocide of Native Americans, the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, and the effect these traumas have on minority communities to this day.
But those committed to preserving history aren’t just making artworks and public speeches about the tragedy; they’re also working to ensure that the victims and their families finally get the recognition and empathy they deserve for their loss.
The fire occurred when New Orleans author Johnny Townsend was only 11 years old. Though he saw horrific photos of the aftermath on TV news at the time, as he grew up, he could find little background on what happened. So in 1989 — 16 years after the fire — he began tracking down the bar’s survivors and former patrons with the help of Rasmussen, the lounge’s surviving bartender.
Through interviews and research, Townsend published the first historical account of what happened as well as profiles for each victim in his 2011 book Let the Faggots Burn. The amateur historian struggled to find a publisher, so he eventually published it himself via BookLocker.com. After the 333-page book was released, a son of one of the fire’s victims approached him after Townsend spoke publicly about the book and said that all he had ever known of his father was what his mother had told him: “Your father was a drunk, and he died at a bar.”
Townsend’s book had given his dad back to him. Today, the historical amnesia is finally being addressed. There are three books about the fire — including Clayton Delery-Edwards’ comprehensive 2014 account, The Up Stairs Lounge Arson, and Robert W. Fieseler’s 2018 nonfiction narrative, Tinderbox.
Three documentaries have been made about the arson, with a fourth in production, as well as one play, a stage musical, four unproduced screenplays, a dance piece, various podcasts, and a permanent art installation.
One of the documentaries, a 2013 short by Royd Anderson, helped the estranged family of World War II veteran Ferris LeBlanc realize that he was one of three “unidentified white males” who perished in the blaze. The city buried his corpse in an unmarked plot within Resthaven Memorial Park, a potter’s field located near the city’s northeastern coast.
Anderson is now working on a documentary called Saving Ferris and pressuring government officials to exhume LeBlanc and give him the proper military burial that he deserved.
Max Vernon’s 2017 stage musical, The View UpStairs, depicts a snarky gay fashionista millennial who buys the dilapidated Up Stairs Lounge to launch his flagship store but is then magically transported to 1973, just before the fire. Despite its tragic content, it has been seen by over 100,000 people — Off-Broadway, in multiple U.S. cities, as well as in England and Australia — and has been translated into Japanese and seen by 20,000 theatergoers. Drag legend RuPaul called the musical “fantastic.”
By Daniel Villarreal Wednesday, October 25, 2023
Fraud 101: Scams and how to spot them
There is no shortage of bad actors out there employing a plethora of schemes all with the same object — separating people an their money or valuables.
But there are ways to spot a scam, and steps you can take if you believe you have been a victim or an intended one.

Prevention is the first and most important step to heading off a scam.
According to the Federal Trade Commission, some typical phone scams include:
• You may be a winner — You may be, but if you have to pay to get the prize, it’s not a prize, it’s a scam.
• You are in trouble with the law — The caller may say you will be arrested or fined if you don’t pay a certain tax or debt. The goal is to frighten you into paying, but real law enforcement agencies do not make such threatening calls.
• Act now — Legitimate businesses will give you time to consider their offer. Take your time and don’t give in to pressure.
• Gift cards are a gift … to the scammer — Callers often ask you to pay by wiring money or using a gift card, prepaid card or cash reload card. The purpose is to make it difficult for you to get your money back. Such calls are almost always a scam.
• Don’t give out private information — Agencies such as Social Security or the IRS will not call you for sensitive information.
• You don’t have to take those robocalls— If you are on the national Do Not Call Registry you should not get live sales calls from companies you’ve not done business with in the past; in fact those calls are illegal, and whether it’s a scam or not, probably a hint that it’s someone you don’t want to do business with.
Some other common scams, the FTC warns, include:
• Impersonators — Someone calls, claiming to be with a government agency or even a love interest. They may even have fake names or numbers to fool your caller ID.
• Debt relief scams — The caller will offer to lower your interest rates or get loan forgiven — but only if you pay first.
• Investment scams — Before you invest your money, check out the potential investment with securities regulators.
• Charity scams — Always check out a charity before parting with your money, and don’t feel pressured to give over the phone.
• Extended car warranties — Callers find out what kind of car you drive and offer overpriced or worthless service contracts.
• Free trials — Be sure you can cancel when the “free trial” is up.
• Loan scams — The scammers target people with poor credit histories to guarantee loans or credit cards for an up-front fee. Legitimate lenders don’t work that way, especially if you have poor credit or no credit.
• Travel or timeshare scams — Free or low-cost vacations can cost you a lot of cash, and sometimes you find out there is no vacation.
When you receive a call you’re not comfortable with, the FTC advises these steps:
• Hang up — As noted above, robocalls are illegal if you are on the Do Not Call Registry. Don’t press numbers or speak to anyone, it will just lead to more robocalls.
• Consider call blocking or call labeling.
• Don’t trust your caller ID — Scammers can make any name or number show up on your phone ID.
Scams can take many forms, and sometimes take the form of a new romance. But, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the same rules of caution apply. Some warning signs:
• A new love who lives far away asks you to wire money or share your credit card number;
•Your love interest asks you to sign a document giving them control of your finances or your house;
• Your love asks you to open a joint bank account or co-sign a loan;
• The new flame asks for access to your bank or credit card accounts.